Real estate tax and rent increase research results (tax transfer and tax consequences)

 The burden of Cho tax burden = non-aqueous electrolyte

Transfer of taxes = Transfer of tax burden to others.

Tax Consequences = Who will ultimately pay?

-> The consequence of tax is borne by the inelastic side.

​

Simply put, the urgent person does it.

​

Example)

​

The government raised property taxes by ten.

There's no tenant who can pay for all 10 of these

I wonder how much out of 10 should be included in the rent.

-> Concerns about tax transfer

​

How much will you raise the final rent after much consideration?

-> Determination of tax consequences

​

Is it a resilient market for renters?

If supply is less than demand/rental advantage

-> Rent goes up by property tax.

​

Is it an inelastic market for renters?

Is the supply sufficiently greater than the demand?

Is it a market where interest rates rise/capital procurement is difficult?

-> Rent rises less than property tax.

Looking back at the 광명셔츠룸 property market in recent years,

Interest rate hike period 18-19 & area where supply was high

-> Reversal tax has occurred, and the money will be returned when the contract is renewed.

​

Interest rates have been cut sharply in 20-21 and liquidity is abundant

-> Overall rent increases, whether there is a lot of supply or not.

​

Rapidly raise interest rates in 22 years and reduce liquidity

: a place of great supply

-> Unsold bombs hit the lease price.

​신림셔츠룸

: Even if the supply is low, and if the landlord has a lot of interest rates, 

 -> Both sales and lease prices are stable, and monthly rent rises

​

: Where supply is low & renters are free of interest

-> Sales increase due to scarcity, and lease prices are maintained

In the end, the market has also raised interest rates at an unprecedented rate this year, and nothing has deviated much from the market principle in which the urgent side is burdened with prices.